Neodialectic sublimation and Marxism

David Sargeant
Department of Literature, University of Illinois

1. Contexts of economy

“Class is part of the failure of consciousness,” says Marx; however, according to Tilton[1] , it is not so much class that is part of the failure of consciousness, but rather the absurdity, and eventually the dialectic, of class. In a sense, the subject is contextualised into a neodialectic sublimation that includes truth as a paradox.
If one examines the neodialectic paradigm of context, one is faced with a choice: either reject neodialectic sublimation or conclude that consciousness is used in the service of the status quo. Foucault suggests the use of Marxism to attack capitalism. Therefore, the characteristic theme of Bailey’s[2] essay on neodialectic sublimation is the stasis of subdeconstructive truth.
Bataille uses the term ‘Marxism’ to denote not narrative, but neonarrative. However, la Fournier[3] implies that we have to choose between neodialectic sublimation and constructivist subdialectic theory.
Sartre uses the term ‘Marxism’ to denote the futility, and subsequent economy, of cultural class. Therefore, the main theme of the works of Madonna is a postmodernist whole.
Lyotard promotes the use of neodialectic sublimation to modify sexual identity. But Bataille uses the term ‘the neodialectic paradigm of context’ to denote the difference between consciousness and class.
Marx suggests the use of neodialectic sublimation to deconstruct outdated, sexist perceptions of sexual identity. However, if dialectic theory holds, we have to choose between neodialectic sublimation and the precapitalist paradigm of narrative.

2. Foucaultist power relations and dialectic feminism

The characteristic theme of de Selby’s[4] critique of Marxism is the dialectic, and some would say the collapse, of dialectic reality. Bataille promotes the use of poststructural deconstruction to read and modify sexual identity. Thus, neodialectic sublimation holds that narrativity is used to entrench sexism.
“Reality is fundamentally unattainable,” says Lyotard. An abundance of narratives concerning the role of the reader as artist may be revealed. In a sense, the without/within distinction depicted in Madonna’s Erotica emerges again in Sex, although in a more mythopoetical sense.
In the works of Madonna, a predominant concept is the distinction between destruction and creation. A number of theories concerning dialectic feminism exist. Thus, Derrida uses the term ‘neodialectic sublimation’ to denote the paradigm, and eventually the dialectic, of materialist class.
“Consciousness is meaningless,” says Sartre; however, according to Hamburger[5] , it is not so much consciousness that is meaningless, but rather the collapse, and subsequent failure, of consciousness. The subject is interpolated into a dialectic feminism that includes reality as a totality. Therefore, Cameron[6] implies that we have to choose between precapitalist socialism and cultural materialism.
“Sexual identity is part of the meaninglessness of consciousness,” says Derrida. Many theories concerning the bridge between class and reality may be discovered. But if Marxism holds, we have to choose between the subtextual paradigm of reality and capitalist sublimation.
The primary theme of the works of Joyce is not discourse as such, but neodiscourse. In a sense, any number of appropriations concerning Marxism exist.
In Dubliners, Joyce analyses Sartreist absurdity; in Finnegan’s Wake he denies Marxism. Thus, Lyotard suggests the use of dialectic feminism to challenge elitist perceptions of sexual identity.
The example of postdialectic capitalist theory prevalent in Joyce’s Dubliners is also evident in A Portrait of the Artist As a Young Man. In a sense, Derrida uses the term ‘Marxism’ to denote a self-sufficient whole.
The main theme of Humphrey’s[7] essay on Sartreist existentialism is the role of the participant as artist. But Debord’s model of neodialectic sublimation holds that the goal of the writer is significant form, given that narrativity is equal to reality.
The primary theme of the works of Joyce is a mythopoetical totality. However, the premise of Marxism states that society, ironically, has intrinsic meaning.
Many theories concerning the futility of dialectic truth may be revealed. In a sense, Marx promotes the use of dialectic feminism to read sexual identity.
The main theme of Hanfkopf’s[8] critique of neodialectic sublimation is the role of the poet as participant. Thus, any number of dematerialisms concerning Marxism exist.

3. Pynchon and neodialectic sublimation

“Society is intrinsically used in the service of capitalism,” says Sartre; however, according to Dahmus[9] , it is not so much society that is intrinsically used in the service of capitalism, but rather the dialectic, and hence the genre, of society. Marx suggests the use of dialectic Marxism to deconstruct sexism. However, Reicher[10] suggests that the works of Pynchon are postmodern.
If neodialectic sublimation holds, we have to choose between dialectic feminism and pretextual narrative. Therefore, Lyotard promotes the use of neodialectic sublimation to attack and read class.
Several discourses concerning a self-fulfilling paradox may be discovered. But the fatal flaw, and eventually the collapse, of Marxism which is a central theme of Rushdie’s Satanic Verses emerges again in The Moor’s Last Sigh, although in a more mythopoetical sense.

---

1. Tilton, Z. B. G. ed. (1999) The Expression of Futility: Marxism and neodialectic sublimation. Loompanics
2. Bailey, S. (1987) Neodialectic sublimation and Marxism. Oxford University Press
3. la Fournier, T. C. ed. (1994) Reassessing Surrealism: Neodialectic sublimation in the works of Madonna. Harvard University Press
4. de Selby, G. (1970) Marxism and neodialectic sublimation. O’Reilly & Associates
5. Hamburger, E. R. D. ed. (1981) The Stasis of Class: Neodialectic sublimation and Marxism. University of North Carolina Press
6. Cameron, I. W. (1999) Neodialectic sublimation in the works of Joyce. Yale University Press
7. Humphrey, Z. F. R. ed. (1977) Subdeconstructive Discourses: Marxism in the works of Stone. O’Reilly & Associates
8. Hanfkopf, J. T. (1990) Neodialectic sublimation in the works of Pynchon. University of California Press
9. Dahmus, A. ed. (1984) Deconstructing Constructivism: Marxism and neodialectic sublimation. University of Illinois Press
10. Reicher, G. E. (1971) Marxism in the works of Rushdie. Loompanics

---

The essay you have just seen is completely meaningless and was randomly generated by the Postmodernism Generator. To generate another essay, follow this link. If you liked this particular essay and would like to return to it, follow this link for a bookmarkable page.
The Postmodernism Generator was written by Andrew C. Bulhak using the Dada Engine, a system for generating random text from recursive grammars, and modified very slightly by Josh Larios (this version, anyway. There are others out there).
This installation of the Generator has delivered 11053775 essays since 25/Feb/2000 18:43:09 PST, when it became operational.
More detailed technical information may be found in Monash University Department of Computer Science Technical Report 96/264: “On the Simulation of Postmodernism and Mental Debility Using Recursive Transition Networks“.
More generated texts are linked to from the sidebar to the right.
If you enjoy this, you might also enjoy reading about the Social Text Affair, where NYU Physics Professor Alan Sokal’s brilliant(ly meaningless) hoax article was accepted by a cultural criticism publication.